This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:50:44 -0500
Subject: Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201326390.18923@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20070220131817.GA13725@caradoc.them.org> <je7iudj63b.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:45:12PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> 
> > That looks wrong... I think Andreas Schwab observed something similar
> > on binutils@ today.  How did the date get doubled?  Or is that a SuSE
> > local change?  It doesn't seem to happen for me.
> 
> It is required to get a unique version.  Otherwise building binutils with
> not-the-quite same version will fail.

I see.  If you add that, I recommend you remove the duplicated copy, then...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]