This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:45:12 +0100
Subject: Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201326390.18923@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <20070220131817.GA13725@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

> That looks wrong... I think Andreas Schwab observed something similar
> on binutils@ today.  How did the date get doubled?  Or is that a SuSE
> local change?  It doesn't seem to happen for me.

It is required to get a unique version.  Otherwise building binutils with
not-the-quite same version will fail.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: gnu ld version check in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]