This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] libstdc++/29989
Joe Buck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
this PR is really a duplicate of 23273, but in my opinion calls for the
below patchlet: std::max and std::min are not special and we are not
supposed to undef anything before introducing the definitions.
Right, but I'm kind of wondering whether this cruft was introduced to
work around something that should have been fixed by fixincludes (does
some platform have headers that define min and max as macros?)
Right, in principle it's possible, or *was* possible, we are talking
about very old cruft.
I suppose we'll find out if new bug reports come in.
Exactly, I think it's worth the risk, early in Stage1.
Paolo.