Re: C++0x support for libstdc++-v3?

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> Your idea of using namespace association to do this is intriguing to
> me: you make it sound easy. I'll bite: I volunteer for this part.
>  
Excellent.

For some TR1 facilities things will be a little harder, when there will 
be substantive changes, for example <tr1/random> -> <random>. I think in 
such cases we should move the "low level" implementation details to a 
separate namespace (and file) and use it both from facilities in 
namespace std and namespace std::tr1. Probably I have to "volunteer" ;) 
for tr1/random... Suggestions about smart ways to achieve that goal are 
welcome, of course...

Yet more problems for <tr1/type_traits> -> <type_traits>, because for 
C++0x the leeway to the implementors will not be available and we will 
need front-end support for some traits. As a matter of fact, I mean to 
work on the latter project too, help also welcome (probably I'm going to 
assign to myself C++/26099, tentatively)

Paolo.