This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions

From: Howard Hinnant <hinnant at twcny dot rr dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:32:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
References: <C65FB780-CA0C-4D86-8979-5B47551F4826@cs.indiana.edu> <m38ximc20b.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net> <24b520d20611071917ybbf8b64u624f81b046082063@mail.gmail.com> <m3odri9ik4.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net> <24b520d20611080605v67f3235ched450228a0eee764@mail.gmail.com> <m3odrhvhvl.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net>

Neither an argument for or against, just trying to inject some data:

krugle (http://www.krugle.com/) gives 8562 hits for "static_assert" in C++ source code. Some of those are upper case defines, which don't matter. Much of those are from boost (or boost clients) and gcc. I suspect that all conflicts will be such that the intended semantics are unchanged.

-Howard

References:
- Re: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]