On Sep 25, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This practically means the compiler should just provide _one_
> -std=c++0x-draft (or whatever name) and _not_ provide preprocessor
> macros for features included in the particular release. This avoids
> giving false promises about stability of these language extensions.
Given that we're only considering features that have been written
into the C++0x Working Draft for this -std=c++0x(-draft?) mode, I
imagine that the chance of features being removed is rather small. 50
+ members of the committee have said "yes" to a feature at least two
times, usually with more than a year in between, before it gets into
the working draft. It would take a significant event for them to
change their minds.