This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Howard Hinnant wrote:
I would prefer something more like:
g++ my_source.cpp -enable_rvalue_refs -enable_variadic_templates -
enable_static_assert -lboost -lAcme
Whereas I would prefer, e.g.,
g++ -std=c++0x -lboost -lAcme
<nod> No arguments here.
A compromise might be to have the individual commands, plus the all-
in-one to easily collect them. But if I had to choose just one way
or the other, I'd choose the all-in-one too (spelled c++0X, c+
+experimental, or whatever).
If we have one flag, the variance in features from version to
version will be queried through feature-test macros (supplied by
the compiler).
Yup.
-Howard