This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] ext/type_traits.h
> I want to say that whereas, per your citation, I also called the trait
> to_* when I "invented" ;) it, the new naming scheme may have advantages:
> we are directing attention to the syntactic notion of adding the
> ""unsigned qualification"" or removing it, not to the actual signedness
> of the types at issue in input and output (I hope I'm sufficiently
> clear).
I think so. FYI this is the reason I think __add_unsigned is better than __add_signed.
-benjamin