This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] ext/type_traits.h
> My only doubt is about uglification: are we sure we want to add the
> non-uglified names numeric_traits and conditional_type (maybe other)?
We don't, you're right.
> It's also a matter of consistency because generally we do uglify
> everything else (e.g., _Value, _Cond, _To_unsigned_type...).
Yep. I'm trying to improve consistency here...
> Personally, to be on the safe side, I'm trying to consistently uglify
> all the new code as mush as possible, same policy of the library proper
> in /ext and /tr1, that is. I was even thinking adjusting unordered_*
> containers and be done with it...
Yeah. Good idea. Now that tr1:: can be considered part of std::, it
only makes sense to play by the rules that std:: is using.
-benjamin