This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch (preview)] libstdc++/24469
Richard Guenther wrote:
I'm only concerned about using _Atomic_word in place of size_t and their
possible different size and alignment requirement. Though it looks safe
from looking at the atomic_word.h files we have:
Yes, I think it is, we are doing much worse things about alignment in
the current basic_string... ;) Also, note that, for now, at least, we
are not suggesting mt_allocator for all the possible targets in the
world, but essentially for gnu/linux and a bit more (the are nasty
issues about static ordering, things like that)
By the way, updated version of our work forthcoming...
Paolo.