This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: volatile qualifier hurts single-threaded optimized case
> This is becoming slightly off-topic, but I'm interested to understand
> this detail better, I think there is also something about it in that
> long thread but there were different opinions. Therefore, you are saying
> that, in gcc at least, using plain pointers together with volatile
> memory is ok? I seemed to remember that, in some cases, in gcc, the type
> of the pointer counts "more" than the type of the memory, so to speak.
I'm interested too, but Richard, may I suggest you start a new thread
that is appropriately titled, and post a patch (or two patches, one
your way one Han's way) based on the current state of libstdc++.
best,
benjamin