This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: notes on current atomics config and usage

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov at mmltd dot net>
To: "Benjamin Kosnik" <bkoz at redhat dot com>, <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 00:09:44 +0300
Subject: Re: notes on current atomics config and usage
References: <20060706152014.0caf055c.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

Anyway. A real, unsettled meta-question is the use of atomic ops in
inline functions. This seems fine, except for the x86 quandary.

Damn you, i386.

And Sparc V7? I have no first-hand experience with Sparc, but Boost contributors tell me that g++ rejects the CAS instruction by default.

References:
- notes on current atomics config and usage
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]