This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Library C++ conformance question

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:59:33 +0200
Subject: Re: Library C++ conformance question
References: <200606141732.KAA05709@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <44904D43.9030902@roguewave.com>

Martin Sebor wrote:

FWIW, I agree with your reading that the facets should ignore
the initial value of the iostate argument.

Notice, however, that the referred text is about *get*, not about get_time, get_date, and so on... Given the current sorry state of the time facets specifications, this is only a minor inconsistency however ;)

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Library C++ conformance question
  - From: Martin Sebor

References:
- Library C++ conformance question
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: Library C++ conformance question
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]