This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, jakub at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:02:25 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- References: <20060127165807.GV32233@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0601311640500.627@wotan.suse.de> <20060131172535.GQ32233@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <43E05F19.4000103@codesourcery.com> <20060201114321.06a000f3.bkoz@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> SONAME 7 has been in progress for some time: there will be no "bumping"
> of the SONAME in mainline, but instead a merge of libstdcxx_so_7-branch.
>
> Remember, hombre? This was the plan that the SC, release manager, and
> libstdc++ developers came up with at the last SONAME change. Seems like
> an improvement to the old process to me.
Yeah, a SONAME bump right now would be so horrible, I don't even want to
start thinking about this, definitely not just for this ldbl-128 feature
;)
Ciao,
Michael.
- References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux