Re: [PATCH] for tr1 progress documentation.

[Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>]

Paolo, sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to Reply all with this last 
night.

Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>
>   
> > > Thinking more about your work, seems to me a pity having it only as a
> > > subsection of 5.2, very hard to notice! Any suggestion for a better
> > > placement? In my opinion could also become a separate entry of 5.  
> > >       
> > I might break out each function in that section.  Maybe we could do
> > the same for the section 5.1 RNG too.
> >     
>
> No, no :) there is a misunderstanding. I was referring to the position
> in the libstc++-v3 documentation of your work. Currently you are simply
> adding a few sentences at the end of Section 5.2, I would be nice
> instead having a new Section 5.x. Ideally, it could be 5.3 but then all
> the other sections should be renumbered, breaking links, and this is
> bad. Idea! A bullet of 5.2 similarly to the various bullets of 4.4. Can
> you do that change?
>   
Sorry. Getting ahead of myself there ;-)
I'll look at the manual tomorrow and think about it.
> Paolo.
>
>   
Here is the 4.1 patch.
Basically, I set the Section 8 C99 compat from done to missing.
I put a line at the top of the table about this pertaining to 4.1 and
referred to the mainline version of the table.
WARNING: The link is wrong!

I figure we can fix that later (or maybe you know where it should point).

Attachment: faq-4.1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data