This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Problems with std::numeric_limits
Paolo Carlini wrote:
Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This did not correspond to my idea of minimum surprise :oP.
But Roberto also explained that the is_specialized member is there for a
reason...
FWIW, if the standard says that numeric_limits<cv-qualified T>
is different than numeric_limits<T> I would consider it a defect
in the standard -- thecv qualifiers have no impact on the basic
properties of a type, so I don't see any reason why numeric_limits
should make a distinction between them either.
Martin