This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: "AlisdairM" <alisdair dot meredith at uk dot renaultf1 dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 19 Dec 2005 15:59:58 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
References: <439EBCF8.4010906@suse.de> <E99BA5CF-48D1-46B8-B1CB-3AF8C0645361@apple.com> <439F5856.2060509@suse.de> <439FFCFC.7040804@suse.de> <43A002FC.6080401@suse.de> <43A03B03.7040209@suse.de> <4A0D6A60-B3C1-4BAB-9C0B-5EC19A992D5A@apple.com> <D0B56507-4C76-4855-8E38-8EE7A7821F05@apple.com> <43A051A3.8060905@suse.de> <43A09131.5000503@suse.de> <FEFBE8D2-3505-4DFA-ABE5-736E2147E194@apple.com> <43A13FA8.90109@suse.de> <B53602A9-4213-4C93-9352-68AAB2A93BB4@apple.com> <43A18772.4040706@suse.de> <E476462D-476E-40AE-9C52-D0C7C5A70B33@apple.com> <43A1939C.4060706@suse.de> <43A1971A.6090304@cs.york.ac.uk> <E7A36DE7-A769-4FE4-A8E6-96BFBD576194@apple.com> <m364pq9d6b.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <do043r$3on$1@sea.gmane.org>

"AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith@uk.renaultf1.com> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|  
| > Deprecation (which is different from removal) is almost never an
| > effective solution for C or C++, as far as I can see.  Since it is
| > there, we would have to support it.  It is an added complexity for no
| > net benefit.
| 
| From a standards perspective, there is not a lot to support with
| vector< bool > anyway as it has no defined behaviour, only defined
| signatures.

Surprisingly, the semantics of vector<bool> is not just that of signatures.

-- Gaby

References:
- [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: chris jefferson
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Howard Hinnant
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [Patch] First bits of the algo merge
  - From: AlisdairM

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]