This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere dot man at levallois dot eu dot org>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 01 Dec 2005 14:13:14 +0100
- Subject: Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
- References: <pan.2005.11.29.16.48.37.733665@levallois.eu.org> <F2B5F487-EF4D-43E4-B2D2-AD7EA914F24F@apple.com> <pan.2005.11.29.22.27.59.180878@levallois.eu.org> <4348dea50511300918w1a9a9ad1g@mail.gmail.com> <20051130173343.GD18129@bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org> <m3k6epvocb.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20051201114418.GC11500@bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org>
Pierre THIERRY <nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org> writes:
| > If you really want to make the codes readable, here is a better and
| > more useful (in my mind) project for you: Implement the #nospam CPP
| > directives so that we don't have to uglify most of the names.
|
| A quick search on the Web and in the libstdc++ documentation didn't
see "Name patterns" in
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/C++STYLE
| bring me anything on that... What are talking about? Do you have URIs on
| the subject?
and have a look at
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2004/n1614.pdf
thanks,
-- Gaby