This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425
chris jefferson wrote:
>In the case where it isn't removed, I find that this loop is slightly
>faster for deques, and slightly slower for vectors. Depends on what
>tradeoff should be made really.
>
>
By the way, in your experiments when isn't the loop removed? In mine,
for vector things are very nice: all the PODs I tried are fine, PODs +
simple constructors are also fine.
Paolo.