libstdc++ archive
date index for November, 2005

This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2005
20:07 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Gabriel Dos Reis
20:00 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Gabriel Dos Reis
19:09 Re: FW: Special functions in TR1 Theodore Papadopoulo
18:30 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code caj
17:33 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Pierre THIERRY
17:31 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Joe Buck
17:28 Re: FW: Special functions in TR1 Paolo Carlini
17:23 FW: Special functions in TR1 Smith-Rowland, Edward M (Contr
17:18 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Jonathan Wakely
17:14 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Pierre THIERRY
16:55 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code caj

November 29, 2005
22:31 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Pierre THIERRY
20:15 Re: vector::operator[] Gabriel Dos Reis
20:03 Re: vector::operator[] Jonathan Wakely
19:47 Re: vector::operator[] Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34 Re: vector::operator[] Theodore Papadopoulo
19:21 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Gabriel Dos Reis
19:17 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:13 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:59 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
18:49 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
18:49 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
18:45 Re: Optimzed vs. readable code Howard Hinnant
18:05 Optimzed vs. readable code Pierre THIERRY
18:03 Re: vector::operator[] Benjamin Kosnik
18:03 Re: vector::operator[] Jonathan Wakely
18:00 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
17:51 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename Jonathan Wakely
17:50 Re: vector::operator[] Paolo Carlini
17:50 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Paolo Carlini
17:49 Re: vector::operator[] Jonathan Wakely
17:48 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename Benjamin Kosnik
17:47 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Joe Buck
17:46 Re: vector::operator[] Paolo Carlini
17:45 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Joe Buck
17:44 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Benjamin Kosnik
17:44 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename Jonathan Wakely
17:43 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename Gabriel Dos Reis
17:40 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:33 Re: matching function for ipfx in gcc 3.4.2 Benjamin Kosnik
17:31 Re: vector::operator[] Theodore Papadopoulo
17:21 RFC libstdc++-v3 -> libstdc++ rename Benjamin Kosnik
17:14 Re: vector::operator[] chris jefferson
17:07 vector::operator[] Howard Hinnant
16:55 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Jonathan Wakely
16:42 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
15:08 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:26 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Jonathan Wakely
14:23 Re: Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Jonathan Wakely
14:12 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
14:10 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
14:06 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
13:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
12:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
11:59 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
09:57 matching function for ipfx in gcc 3.4.2 anandi.thirunavukkarasu
04:05 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
03:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
03:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
02:30 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:53 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
00:25 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Jonathan Wakely
00:00 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis

November 28, 2005
23:16 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
22:49 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:28 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
21:57 Re: matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2 Jonathan Wakely
18:00 Re: [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple> Andrew Pinski
17:55 [patch] : Tiny change to _NullClass in <tr1/tuple> chris jefferson
00:32 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Paolo Carlini

November 27, 2005
17:22 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Gabriel Dos Reis
12:59 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! chris jefferson
12:23 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Paolo Carlini
10:18 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Paolo Carlini
04:30 Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time! Gabriel Dos Reis

November 26, 2005
21:24 It's v7-> mainline merge time! Paolo Carlini
19:21 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini
17:48 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Jonathan Wakely
14:22 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Howard Hinnant
09:51 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini
04:09 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:19 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant

November 25, 2005
23:36 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini
23:29 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini
22:26 Re: Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Howard Hinnant
19:00 Deque... (Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini

November 24, 2005
23:15 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
22:54 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Geoffrey Keating
19:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:57 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
18:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Peter Dimov
18:39 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
18:33 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
18:32 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
17:41 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
17:12 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Bo Persson
16:52 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Howard Hinnant
13:19 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
13:05 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
12:28 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? chris jefferson
10:46 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
09:34 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:00 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
01:44 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
00:49 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ Paolo Carlini

November 23, 2005
19:26 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Howard Hinnant
12:11 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? Paolo Carlini
11:53 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)? chris jefferson

November 22, 2005
01:08 [v3] libstdc++/23591 Benjamin Kosnik
01:03 Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset Paolo Carlini
00:40 Re: [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset Gabriel Dos Reis
00:15 [Patch, RFA] libstdc++/24975: aliasing rules violations in set/multiset Paolo Carlini
00:13 [v3] makefile tweaks for CXXFLAGS, etc Benjamin Kosnik

November 18, 2005
14:36 Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 Paolo Carlini
09:39 Re: Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..) Alexander Terekhov
01:17 Current __exchange_and_add on ia64 (was: Memory barriers..) Paolo Carlini

November 17, 2005
23:32 Re: eprintf for darwin, as committed Benjamin Kosnik
20:09 eprintf for darwin, as committed Geoffrey Keating

November 16, 2005
16:23 Re: eprintf, darwin, etc. Benjamin Kosnik
15:48 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
15:37 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
11:27 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
02:58 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
01:32 Re: lazy facet instantiation Martin Sebor
00:45 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ Kurt Kohler
00:10 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ Paolo Carlini
00:00 Re: new link errors with latest stdc++ Paolo Carlini

November 15, 2005
23:50 new link errors with latest stdc++ Kurt Kohler
21:53 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
21:03 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
20:49 Re: lazy facet instantiation Martin Sebor
20:44 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
20:40 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
20:19 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
20:16 Re: lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
19:53 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
19:45 Re: lazy facet instantiation Paolo Carlini
19:02 lazy facet instantiation Howard Hinnant
06:06 eprintf, darwin, etc. Geoffrey Keating
04:52 libstdc++ configury fix for darwin exports Geoffrey Keating

November 14, 2005
19:35 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings Paolo Carlini
19:16 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings Benjamin Kosnik
12:10 Re: [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings Paolo Carlini
11:17 [Patch, v7] DR 431 for sso/rc-strings Paolo Carlini

November 11, 2005
22:02 Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? Mats Wichmann
18:54 Re: LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? Benjamin Kosnik
15:10 Re: sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
14:35 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini
14:23 Re: sso tradeoffs Peter Dimov
14:19 Re: sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
11:21 [RFH] libstdc++ compatibility configured with different allocators Matthias Klose
11:07 LSB 3.0 compliance of libstdc++.so.6 independent of allocator? Matthias Klose
01:44 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
01:17 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini

November 10, 2005
23:01 Re: sso tradeoffs Gabriel Dos Reis
22:37 Re: sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
22:25 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Peter Dimov
14:15 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Andrew Pinski
08:20 Re: Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads. Gabriel Dos Reis
07:35 Q. about GDR's addition of complex-accessor overloads. Jan van Dijk
03:03 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Gabriel Dos Reis
01:24 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps Benjamin Kosnik
01:21 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Paolo Carlini
00:59 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Gabriel Dos Reis
00:50 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Gabriel Dos Reis
00:40 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps Benjamin Kosnik

November 09, 2005
23:30 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps Benjamin Kosnik
19:32 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
16:13 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream Paolo Carlini
16:06 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream Theodore Papadopoulo
13:55 Re: Getting file descriptors from ifstream Paolo Carlini
13:51 Getting file descriptors from ifstream massimiliano cialdi
13:48 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
12:16 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
11:54 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Alexander Terekhov

November 08, 2005
23:15 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Kurt Kohler
22:32 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
22:27 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Kurt Kohler
21:34 Re: const valarray question DJ Delorie
21:26 Re: const valarray question Gabriel Dos Reis
21:25 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
21:06 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
20:53 const valarray question DJ Delorie
20:40 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators Paolo Carlini
20:08 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators Howard Hinnant
19:21 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Peter Dimov
18:51 Re: Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Kurt Kohler
18:14 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators Paolo Carlini
18:07 Re: ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators Paolo Carlini
18:01 ext/vstring.h swap vs unequal allocators Paolo Carlini
13:57 Memory barriers vs lock/unlock Paolo Carlini
12:25 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature Paolo Carlini
12:16 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature Richard Guenther
11:16 __gcc_cpu_feature Paolo Carlini
02:39 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
02:25 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:33 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
00:55 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
00:49 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis

November 07, 2005
23:37 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:40 Re: segv when thread exits after throw/catch of C++ exception Benjamin Kosnik
22:25 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
22:13 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:46 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
21:28 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:51 Re: empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
18:57 segv when thread exits after throw/catch of C++ exception Ed Connell
18:50 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:23 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Gabriel Dos Reis
17:11 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vsnumeric_limits<integer>::traps Benjamin Kosnik
16:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
16:25 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ulrich Drepper
16:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Andrew Pinski
15:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ulrich Drepper
15:58 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
15:48 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Andrew Pinski
15:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Daniel Jacobowitz
15:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ulrich Drepper
15:27 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Daniel Jacobowitz
15:20 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ulrich Drepper
14:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:25 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
13:17 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Peter Dimov
12:54 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
12:53 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
12:45 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 bert hubert
11:25 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
11:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
11:15 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
11:04 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
10:56 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 bert hubert
10:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:41 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
10:29 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
10:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:08 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
08:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
08:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
08:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
08:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
02:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
01:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
01:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
01:11 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
00:35 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini

November 06, 2005
23:37 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
21:17 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Mark Mitchell
21:13 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ulrich Drepper
21:12 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
21:07 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Florian Weimer
20:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
20:34 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Florian Weimer
20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Peter Dimov
20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Florian Weimer
20:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
20:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Ian Lance Taylor
19:54 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
19:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
19:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Mark Mitchell
19:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
19:26 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Mark Mitchell
19:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
19:16 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
19:02 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Mark Mitchell
18:56 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
18:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Henderson
18:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
18:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Mark Mitchell
17:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Howard Hinnant
14:12 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
13:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
11:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
10:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Richard Guenther
10:34 Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3 Paolo Carlini
01:31 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
01:15 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 bert hubert
01:09 Re: exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 Paolo Carlini
00:40 exchange_and_add inlined in g++ 4.0.2 bert hubert

November 04, 2005
19:54 Re: [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Paolo Carlini
17:38 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Benjamin Kosnik
17:03 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Howard Hinnant
15:47 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
15:34 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Paolo Carlini
15:26 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
15:22 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Howard Hinnant
15:20 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Howard Hinnant
11:01 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Paolo Carlini
10:35 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Paolo Carlini
10:26 Re: GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Paolo Carlini
10:05 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
09:38 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
01:27 GCC Bugzilla Bug 24025 Howard Hinnant

November 03, 2005
18:40 [RFA] libstdc++/22203, aka PowerPC vs numeric_limits<integer>::traps Paolo Carlini
14:47 Re: sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
13:11 [v3] Further tweak sso_string::_M_swap Paolo Carlini
11:15 Re: empty slices: defined? Paolo Carlini
11:14 Re: empty slices: defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:03 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini
09:50 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini

November 02, 2005
22:18 empty slices: defined? DJ Delorie
18:55 Re: sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
18:48 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini
18:35 Re: sso tradeoffs Paolo Carlini
18:17 sso tradeoffs Howard Hinnant
15:34 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
15:18 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
15:00 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 chris jefferson
14:57 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
14:24 [Patch, v7] libstdc++/24617 (was: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425) Paolo Carlini
13:44 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
13:22 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 chris jefferson

November 01, 2005
20:17 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
18:03 Re: Silently passing wrong input for good one Paolo Carlini
16:39 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Howard Hinnant
16:31 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini
16:13 Re: [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Howard Hinnant
13:53 [Patch] libstdc++/23425 Paolo Carlini

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3