This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Concept-check bug ?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov at mmltd dot net>
Cc: "Jonathan Wakely" <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>, <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 17 Jun 2005 15:34:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Concept-check bug ?
References: <20050617115348.GA51111@compsoc.man.ac.uk><002701c57335$dc5fbd50$6401a8c0@pdimov2><20050617123447.GA52368@compsoc.man.ac.uk><m38y19rvsy.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><007601c5733c$02c8c030$6401a8c0@pdimov2>

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:

| >> Presumably the truly legal way to do it is with a (smart) pointer to
| >> the
| >
| > Probably "legal", but surely overkill and obfuscatory.
| 
| We all believe that this is a defect; no need to argue.

Interesting you see it as arguing.

-- Gaby

References:
- Concept-check bug ?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Concept-check bug ?
  - From: Peter Dimov
- Re: Concept-check bug ?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Concept-check bug ?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Concept-check bug ?
  - From: Peter Dimov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]