This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

>| Is this what you were implying? I think you are right WRT to the rest
>| of the deprecated headers, at least the ones in the C++ standard under
>| annex D. We have to keep these for the time being.
>
>Yes.  Let's remove complex.h.
>  
>
Humm, therefore we are going to remove *only* complex.h and keep all the
others?!? Also, I checked Annex D and, besides <strstream>, which is not
really the point of this thread, I don't see any C++ *.h header
mentioned. I only see the heading "Old iostreams members", notice
*members*, which indeed we provide. Really, I'm not convinced that we
have a sound rationale for removing complex.h and keep all the other
backward headers.

Paolo.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]