This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury


Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Hi,
| 
| the use of the new __builtin_clog exposed a serious weakness in our
| configury: the check for ac_c99_complex (and then for
| _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX), uses the C compiler together with
| AC_TRY_COMPILE: we are basically checking for prototypes but C (vs C++)
| doesn't care and this means that the test basically *always* passes. I
| propose to simply use AC_TRY_LINK, here and I'm finishing regtesting the
| below.

Should not we test both compilation and link?
The reason is that if we don't check for declaration, we might end up
with a conflicting declaration.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]