This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>,Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:29:50 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
References: <20050525165953.592f5d9f.bkoz@redhat.com> <4294F89C.4060104@suse.de> <m3mzqjvt4m.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu> <42958185.8080100@suse.de> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505260258350.15731@sun> <4299922E.8070001@suse.de> <429995F6.1060605@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

>2- *More serious*: at the moment I don't know how to print the
>instantiation types, for templates (that the real assert prints)
>  
>
Eh, eh, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ does the trick... I begin to seriously like
this idea... ;)

Paolo.

References:
- [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/20534, debug mode vs. includes
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]