This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: listdc++-v3 check-abi summary missing by test_summary

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, aj at suse dot de, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:58:38 -0700
Subject: Re: listdc++-v3 check-abi summary missing by test_summary
References: <m3mzqgaeyg.fsf@gromit.moeb> <4297383F.1070802@suse.de> <20050527103947.79a0150d.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

But previously this was output also by test_summary.  This does not
happen anymore.  Is this really intented?
I think it is and *nobody* likes this new behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-05/msg00239.html

What we did was to move the test into DejaGNU, which makes sense, as far as it goes. The previous method was ad-hoc, and just happened to have output that looked like it was coming from DejaGNU.

To get back more detail, the right thing would be to create a separate DejaGNU test for each test being done by the ABI-checking code, rather than doing it all at once.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- listdc++-v3 check-abi summary missing by test_summary
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: listdc++-v3 check-abi summary missing by test_summary
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: listdc++-v3 check-abi summary missing by test_summary
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]