This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch] libstdc++/13943
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| >| - inline long long
| >| - llabs(long long __x) { return __x >= 0 ? __x : -__x; }
| >| -
| >| #if !_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_LONG_LONG_DYNAMIC
| >| + using ::llabs;
| >
| >This means that we provide llabs() only if
| >!_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_LONG_LONG_DYNAMIC. That looks to me like a ABI breakage
| >from previous version. Similar to the lldiv() case.
| >Is my reading correct?
| >
| >
| Well, I would not call it an ABI breakage, because, simply, if
| _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_LONG_LONG_DYNAMIC the code would not compile. Which
| binary interface are we breaking? Also, I think that when
| _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_LONG_LONG_DYNAMIC, indeed, the user expects long long
| functions *not* being available.
OK then.
-- Gaby