This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:34:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664
References: <428E1D70.7010705@suse.de><20050520171751.59aac887@belmont.artheist.org><428E6290.4060802@suse.de>

> Like? I have no idea which is the right syntax?!? We are using this
> approach in libsupc++ and Mark confirmed or not?!?

Sorry, I just re-read that bugzilla list. It seems as if that is a
feature enhancement, and that this goo is what is going to be the
current approach. Boo.

I'll write the feature enhancement.

However, I'm going to insist that you put in a placeholder test case in
the testsuite for this. We will never be able to track this linkage issue without it.

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- [Patch] libstdc++/19664
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] libstdc++/19664
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]