This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Replace fork with try_fork in testsuite?

> >>This will mean, however, that these defines end up in c++config.h,
> >>even though they'll be unused in the library proper. 
> > 
> > This is rather "strange" isn't it? But cannot really hurt, I think. If
> > you agree, please go ahead.
> 
> Yes, it's weird, but I think harmless.  Benjamin said it was OK to have 
> testsuite-only messages in the translation files that ship, so I think 
> it should also be OK to have some testsuite-only macros in the 
> c++config.h that ships.

Weird but harmless, agreed. We already have this kind of testsuite-only
thing in c++config.h. See: 

HAVE_LIMIT_AS, DATA, FSIZE, RSS, VMEM.

There's probably a better, but less convenient, way to do this. It escapes me, however.

-benjamin
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]