Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| >I'll get to that, as soon as possible.
| >  
| >
| Since you are aiming for consensus,

you already told that you I do not "have your consensus".  But, you
did not tell me to post a patch.  Did you?

| I will expect detailed answers to my objections, however.

I read your objections and hear you.  For all pratical concerns I have
raised, you opposed "a small fraction of the users pays attention".
Now, I frankly don't know whether Dinkumware customers and users of
their product are accounted for in your estimation.  But, never mind.

You raised "complexity", while at the same time you embrass the TR1
which is not even approved yet and far more complex than this
particular issue.  Now, when the standard is changed, the complexity is
going to vanish?

-- Gaby