This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
Jonathan Wakely <cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk> writes:
| On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:25:37PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > Surely it is. If you happen to have a patch around, please post it so
| > we can look at it.
|
| I'm afraid not, no time to prepare one either.
| I'll try to prepare a docs patch tonight though, to document the new
| behaviour.
OK. I'll get to that, as soon as possible.
It would be pity if corporate internal interests would get in the way.
-- Gaby
- References:
- std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.