This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:00:47 +0200
Subject: Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
References: <424749A0.9080100@yahoo.com.br> <42491EEB.10007@suse.de> <424B4263.9010106@yahoo.com.br> <20050331135422.GB24185@compsoc.man.ac.uk>

Jonathan Wakely wrote:

>Paolo, Chris, was the resolution to PR19433 the right one?
>  
>
Yes definitely it is, because we are simply implementing the exact text
of the current standard. DR 233 is in the *Open* status, a long way
before "TC" or even "Ready". Why are you suspecting something strange
going on?!?

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
  - From: Daniel K. O.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
  - From: Daniel K. O.
- Re: std::map and std::set based on AVL, not RB trees.
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]