This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] What to do for complex::pow(0, 0)
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:10:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] What to do for complex::pow(0, 0)
- References: <42317B89.6070107@suse.de>
Paolo Carlini wrote:
(*) This solution would also fix, as a side-effect, that (rather low
priority) PR mentioned above because we would avoid computing atan2(0,
0), which is not guaranteed to be 1 in non-C99 libcs.
Of course I meant zero, not 1, here.
Paolo.