This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Change to search_n

From: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>
To: Dimitris Xochellis <jimxoch at yahoo dot gr>
Cc: Chris Jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:19:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Change to search_n
References: <421B9059.8090704@cs.york.ac.uk> <20050228063522.85795.qmail@web52803.mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 06:35:22AM +0000, Dimitris Xochellis wrote:

> Its mainly the expressions like (__last - __first >
> __count) that are producing these warnings. These
> expression will fail to work as expected in case
> __first > __last.

Wouldn't that be an invalid range, which breaks the preconditions of
search_n?

jon

-- 
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.
	- Niels Bohr

References:
- Re: Change to search_n
  - From: Chris Jefferson
- Re: Change to search_n
  - From: Dimitris Xochellis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]