This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [patch] Preprocessorised tr1::tuple
On Feb 25, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Chris Jefferson wrote:
Unfortunatly, unlike Douglas' function code, I feel that there are
just too many things that have to change in the tuple header
depending on length, so trying to write the code in the style he
wrote, while much faster would be much harder to read / maintain...
About this: I'm wondering whether we should actually have our own
pre-processor library. Agreed, the applications are different, maybe
some may compile faster with an ad-hoc solution, but I believe we are
at risk of duplicating very similar solutions. What I'm missing is an
estimate of how *many* other tr1 facilities need pre-proprocessor
"magic"... Anyone got a figure?
bind and result_of will also need this preprocessor magic. I think
that's it for TR1...
Doug