Re: [patch] Preprocessorised tr1::tuple

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> Yeah, along with the all other docs I've promised to rewrite, and the
> permissions I have to obtain for the shared_ptr code, no problem! ;-)
>
> Seriously, I haven't used PCH for anything but trivial tests, because
> they're broken on FreeBSD (and the impression I get is they're broken
> nearly everywhere except Linux, though I think that's unfair and I've
> had a bad impression of them.)  I did try a tr1.gch PCH as you suggest
> and it worked OK (on Linux).
>  
Ok... ;)

> I *certainly* won't be tackling docs until my day job calms down and I
> get the shared_ptr copyright issues resolved. btw, shall I commit the
> two patches at these URLs or wait for the copyright issues to be cleared
> up?  The first one is essential and the second one IMHO a good idea:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-02/msg00185.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-02/msg00187.html
>  
Maybe better waiting a bit?

Paolo.