This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:27:38PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Jonathan Wakely <cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk> writes: > > > I thought the copyright notice in the file applies to the derivative > > work, not the entire work or the original work. *That* copyright is > > assigned to the FSF. All the SGI and HP code in libstdc++ also retains > > the original copyrights. > > > > If I'm wrong, or if we need clarification, I'll contact the authors > > again. > > I think the relevant issue is what license is used for the contributed > code. If the code is under the GPL or under GPL+exception, I believe > the FSF wants to be the sole copyright holder. If the code is under a > BSD-style license, then it is OK to keep the original copyright > notice. The relevant point is that the FSF wants to be able to, if > necessary, file suit for GPL copyright violations, which it can only > do if it holds the copyright. OK. At least one of the authors said he would give his permission for the code to be used as long as it was under a GPL or Boost licence. Which if you're right would mean the FSF would want an assignment from him. I will get in touch with them again and raise the idea. As it might make it easier to get the code accepted I should remove the checked_delete feature. That would reduces the number of authors from five to three. It's a QoI feature not required by the TR and G++ gives a warning when calling "delete" on an incomplete type anyway. I'll commit the attached patch if a v3 maintainer approves it. > If this code is going to be distributed with a GCC release, and if it > is under GPL or GPL+exception, and if the FSF is not the sole > copyright holder, then I think this needs to be raised with the GCC > SC. Or you need to get regular FSF copyright assignments. > The above is, of course, just my opinion. Noted, but I'm still grateful for it, thanks. I'll get in touch with the copyright holders again. jon -- "It is easier to port a shell than a shell script." - Larry Wall
Attachment:
deleter.patch
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |