This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] setlocale(LC_ALL) vs setlocale(LC_NUMERIC)

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:03:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] setlocale(LC_ALL) vs setlocale(LC_NUMERIC)
References: <41F8FD82.1030009@suse.de> <41FA6E37.6010604@roguewave.com>

Martin Sebor wrote:

I expected to find at least some locales where this wasn't true
(e.g., those that use aliases like "german" or "de" for "de_DE)
but I ended up with none on any of the machines I tried (which
included AIX, HP-UX, Linux, Solaris, and Tru64). So while I
wouldn't want to bet my paycheck on it I think it might be
a pretty safe assumption to make in a test suite.


Thanks Martin. I can also confirm FreeBSD (which we are also
supporting), and a full range of Solaris. Nice.

Paolo.

References:
- [RFC] setlocale(LC_ALL) vs setlocale(LC_NUMERIC)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [RFC] setlocale(LC_ALL) vs setlocale(LC_NUMERIC)
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]