This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Chris Jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>,Douglas Gregor <dgregor at cs dot indiana dot edu>,libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:31:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support
References: <200501260202.47184.dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> <20050126120820.72300ff1@belmont.artheist.org> <41F7DFC0.4060409@cs.york.ac.uk>

Chris Jefferson wrote:

I'm happy to adapt my tuple generation program to generate this header, which would have the advantage it would remove of 10 on the maximum size. Of course this leads to other problems which I'm not positive how to fix.... but it seems like it's not impossible someone might hit the 10-parameter (I've seen functions with more, although not in very nice code)

By the way: *where* is it (the tuple generation program)?!?

Assuming we really we want to go this way, we should provide it and document its usage.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support
  - From: Chris Jefferson

References:
- [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support
  - From: Douglas Gregor
- Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] TR1 'function' and 'mem_fn' support
  - From: Chris Jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]