This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch/RFC] libstdc++/19343
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Yes. The way Andreas analysis came to me was that he wanted to matkeOk, fine.
the _M_get() function noreturn.
By the way, I'm committing a version of the patch which uses:
as suggested in the audit trail. Indeed, seems more correct to me wrt
pollution. Actually, I think we should audit the whole library wrt this