This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [Patch/RFC] libstdc++/19495
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Done, re-opened as "enhancement".
100% agreed. Summarizing, we have at least two open issues:
1- Avoiding _Rep in static memory, probably we can neatly obtain that
via a "short-string optimization" type solution.
We should probably put this in enhancement status, not resolved, since
workarounds exist but we'd like to do better. Thoughts?
100% agreed!Yes, that's a nice idea, very soon we'll start on this.
This could initially go in as an extension, if you'd like to work that
way. We could have a __gnu_cxx::basic_string, for instance.
Just a thought.