This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Future evolution of c++config.h and _GLIBCXX_USE_LONG_LONG
On Jan 11, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm leaning toward choice 1: it's inelegant but probably safe.
Anyone want to give me arguments in either direction, or suggest a
Instinctively, I agree with you, and, furthermore:
Thanks. You're right, that's quite relevant.
I suppose another question that's implicit but that I didn't ask is:
would it be a desirable feature to give users a way of getting a fully
conforming C++ language/library implementation without having to
reconfigure and reinstall? Should there be a compiler switch that does
Please note that this is not a rhetorical question. I'm not pushing
for one answer or the other. (It's also a question that's not
tremendously relevant right now, since it's a little late in the gcc
release cycle to add a new feature like that.)