This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
stlport v/s libstdc++
- From: Abhi <abhi at qualcomm dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:23:11 -0800
- Subject: stlport v/s libstdc++
- Reply-to: Abhi <abhi at qualcomm dot com>
At the risk of starting a religious war!
I have been wondering about the pros/cons of using stlport v/s libstdc++
with a gcc compiler 3.4 on FC2 (i.e. kernel 2.6.*)
- What are the performance implications? Are there any numbers/comparisons
out there for some micro-benchmarks?
- I believe STLport has hashmaps v/s libstdc++ has them under extensions
(last I checked). Are these any different?
- Issues with Memory allocators?
- portability issues? Which one is more portable (OS of interest: vxWorks,
netbsd, FC2)
Essentially I need these details to determine if we will use STLport or
libstdc++
Thanks
- Abhi