This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmx dot net>,libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:08:34 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
References: <1097657440.30930.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1097662905.32276.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1097676009.2180.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <416D3B9A.1000009@suse.de> <1097679613.2948.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <416D443F.7090606@suse.de> <1097688116.9071.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <416D6B94.5040706@suse.de> <1097693721.18124.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <416DB1EA.9070800@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

A *very down to earth* proposal: can't you simply stop referring internally to unsigned int (T is unsigned int currently, right?) which is only 16 bits both on 32-bit and 64-bit machines?


Of course I meant 32 bits: my point was that is 32 bits *both* on 32-bit and
64-bit machines.

Paolo.

References:
- [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [Patch] bitmap_allocator.
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]