This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:04:15 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
References: <874qlpxyi0.fsf@codesourcery.com> <41528067.4060109@codesourcery.com> <xyp65647oyo.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com>

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about
> > the safety of the patch.  I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it.  I
> > certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function
> > declaration is a win.
> >
> > I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
> > decision

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I agree.

You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
are happy with the patch? :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]