This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
On Jul 31, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:
| Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
|
| >I think it makes more sense to make include/tr1/type_traits,
| >tr1/type_compare, tr1/type_transform. These includes would be
modeled on
| >the proposed files in TR1. Also remove all the various other traits
| >bits we have now: bits/type_traits.h, bits/cpp_type_traits.h.
| >
| Hi Benjamin, all,
|
| taking into account both your and Matt messages (his "snag", in
| particular) seems
| still a nice idea completing the project that I started before my
| vacations (as a side
| effect of moving from function templates overloads to class templates
| partial
| specializations): changing all the library to use *only*
| cpp_type_traits.h. Now that
| stl_algobase.h is done, the rest of the project is just a matter of
| few hours of work.
| I can post a patch next week.
I believe Matt's suggestion is the right long term approach, assuming
we have an implementation of #nospam. For the mid-term, I think that
using bits/cpp_type_traits.h is the most viable option -- with proper
uglification.
I wonder if this does have to be "long term"? If we think that we
have a good specification of preprocessor scoping, I bet it won't
be that hard to implement.
I don't attend EWG sessions, so I don't have a good sense of how it
was received. Did it look to you as if the feature is ready to
implement as Bjarne proposed it?
--Matt