This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:22:23 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658
References: <4108C79F.3010905@suse.de> <20040729094514.22ee6414.bkoz@redhat.com> <41091F6C.4040400@suse.de> <20040729110810.30da5db7.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

What about the branch, where the locking code is different? An appropriate backport seems definitely feasible...

I agree! I think the infrastructure is there to use the locks, so we should. Since there are a couple of bugs about this stuff, it would be wise IMHO to backport the locale locking fixes to gcc-3.4.

Agreed! I will post soon what would go in 3_4-branch...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [Patch] Further fix for 12658
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Further fix for 12658
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]