This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: LSB patch to gcc 3.3 tree
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdr at acm dot org, dbb at beatties dot us, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,mats dot d dot wichmann at intel dot com, anderson at freestandards dot org,dbb at freestandards dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:44:28 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: LSB patch to gcc 3.3 tree
- References: <20040628205604.GF14453@beatties.us><32889.::ffff:128.194.146.36.1088456910.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net><Pine.LNX.4.58.0406290051440.14966@wotan.suse.de><37195.::ffff:24.250.169.187.1088469697.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net><Pine.LNX.4.58.0406290957350.14966@wotan.suse.de><37281.::ffff:24.250.169.187.1088500480.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net><20040629083817.0cafdb3a.bkoz@redhat.com>
Hi Benjamin,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >Hi Matt, thanks for producing the patch. Given feedback from
> >Benjamin and the fact that we cannot export more than GCC-3.4.x
> >does, I propose you you commit this in a very fours (give a chance
> >for LSB people to react.)
>
> I agree.
Okay. I'll wait until (my) tomorrow morning.
> > [... stdio_filebuf::{fd,dtor} not needed ...]
>
> Same here.
Cool.
> >> + _ZNSt23__codecvt_abstract_base*;
> >> +
> >> } GLIBCPP_3.2.3;
>
> This should be in a new section, GLIBCPP_3.2.5
>
> Please just use the 3.4. style instead of these blanket exports.
Okay.
> >> +CXXABI_1.2.2 {
> >> +} CXXABI_1.2.1;
>
> .... like this part, which is fine.
Wonderful. Many thanks for the feedback.
Ciao,
Michael.