This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] std::string(0);

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:52:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
References: <cac9qs$v2f$1@sea.gmane.org><20040611161554.GA82121@compsoc.man.ac.uk><cacn6e$6uo$1@sea.gmane.org> <40C9E9FE.4040109@roguewave.com><cacreq$kai$1@sea.gmane.org><20040611181803.GD25518@tofu.dreamhost.com><40C9FD5B.3040603@roguewave.com>

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:43:39 -0600, Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:

> I would much prefer defining meaningful behavior for it than turning it
> into an anal retentive error and breaking well-formed programs or
> implementations.

I agree.

Jason

References:
- [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]