Re: [v3] Mt_alloc: use __bin._M_free[0]

[Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmx dot net>]

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 01:27, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Dhruv Matani wrote:
> 
> >Ok, maybe the 2nd one will have these, but just in case.
> >  
> >
> No, the 2nd one deals with another, completely unrelated issue.

Ok.

> >Looking at this part of the code, you could make the operation 
> >O(1), if the number of free blocks in the global free list is <= 
> >those required. Just reset the pointer to NULL for the global 
> >list, and set the next pointer of the current free list to the 
> >one of the global free list's old value.
> >  
> >
> I see what you mean: nice idea. Are you willing to prepare and test
> a patch implementing this?

Sure. By tomorrow it should be ready.

> 
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
-- 
        -Dhruv Matani.
http://www.geocities.com/dhruvbird/

Proud to be a Vegetarian.
http://www.vegetarianstarterkit.com/
http://www.vegkids.com/vegkids/index.html