This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] libstdc++/15361, or: remove or fix the SGI extensions in bitset??
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 10 May 2004 21:27:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFC] libstdc++/15361, or: remove or fix the SGI extensions in bitset??
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <409F9E7F.5000707@suse.de>
Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:
| Hi,
|
| the PR points out some problems (I'm almost sure the analysis is correct)
| in 3.4.0 with the SGI extension bitset::_M_do_find_next.
|
| However, before further studying the technical details of the PR, seems
| appropriate deciding whether we really want to /keep/ that extension (and
| _M_do_find_first) or not!
|
| What do you think?
Do people use it? It is ill-designed? Is its maintainance costing
very high -- compared to other extensions we have?
-- Gaby